Hooksett, NH vs Milford, NH

Milford is moderately more affordable than Hooksett, with a 10.3% lower cost of living index. Hooksett scores 118 compared to 107 for Milford, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Hooksett can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Hooksett is $1,829/month compared to $1,388/month in Milford — a 32% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Milford has cheaper rent, Hooksett actually has lower median home values ($298,900 vs $337,900).

Median household income in Hooksett is $91,005 compared to $81,042 in Milford (+12.3%). While Hooksett is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Hooksett spend roughly 24.1% of their income on rent, more than the 20.6% in Milford.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (47.2°F vs 50.1°F). Hooksett receives more rainfall at 42" per year compared to 40.4" in Milford.