Home / Compare / Hooksett vs Meredith

Hooksett, NH vs Meredith, NH

118
Hooksett
New Hampshire
VS
+7.1%
110
Meredith
New Hampshire

Meredith is moderately more affordable than Hooksett, with a 7.1% lower cost of living index. Hooksett scores 118 compared to 110 for Meredith, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Hooksett can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Hooksett is $1,829/month compared to $1,255/month in Meredith — a 46% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Meredith has cheaper rent, Hooksett actually has lower median home values ($298,900 vs $415,800).

Median household income in Hooksett is $91,005 compared to $52,083 in Meredith (+74.7%). While Hooksett is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Hooksett spend roughly 24.1% of their income on rent, less than the 28.9% in Meredith.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (47.2°F vs 47.2°F). Meredith receives more rainfall at 42" per year compared to 42" in Hooksett.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Hooksett
118
Meredith
110
7% cheaper
Median Household Income
Hooksett
$91,005
43% higher
Meredith
$52,083

Housing

Median Rent
Hooksett
$1,829
Meredith
$1,255
31% cheaper
Median Home Value
Hooksett
$298,900
28% cheaper
Meredith
$415,800
Population
Hooksett
5,362
Meredith
2,887

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula:

Climate

NOAA 30-year normals (1991-2020)

Avg Temp
Hooksett 47.2°F
Meredith 47.2°F
Summer High
Hooksett 83°F
Meredith 83°F
Winter Low
Hooksett 13°F
Meredith 13°F
Rainfall
Hooksett 42"
Meredith 42"
Rainy Days
Hooksett 133d
Meredith 133d