Home / Compare / Hobart vs Waterloo

Hobart, WI vs Waterloo, WI

99
Hobart
Wisconsin
VS
+22.4%
81
Waterloo
Wisconsin

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Waterloo is 22.4% cheaper than Hobart. With a cost index of 81 vs 99, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Waterloo to Hobart should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Hobart is $1,226/month compared to $974/month in Waterloo — a 26% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Waterloo is more affordable at $219,100 median vs $363,500.

Median household income in Hobart is $111,918 compared to $78,103 in Waterloo (+43.3%). While Hobart is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Hobart spend roughly 13.1% of their income on rent, less than the 15% in Waterloo.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Hobart
99
Waterloo
81
18% cheaper
Median Household Income
Hobart
$111,918
30% higher
Waterloo
$78,103

Housing

Median Rent
Hobart
$1,226
Waterloo
$974
21% cheaper
Median Home Value
Hobart
$363,500
Waterloo
$219,100
40% cheaper
Population
Hobart
10,418
Waterloo
3,542

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula:

Everyday Prices

BLS Average Prices by metro area

Gasoline (regular)
Hobart $2.88
Waterloo $2.88
US $3.07
🥚
Eggs (grade A, large)
Hobart $2.35
Waterloo $2.35
US $2.50
🥛
Milk (whole)
Hobart $3.78
Waterloo $3.78
US $4.03
🍞
Bread (white)
Hobart $1.74
Waterloo $1.74
US $1.85
🍗
Chicken breast
Hobart $3.89
Waterloo $3.89
US $4.14
Electricity
Hobart $0.17
Waterloo $0.17
US $0.19