Hitchcock, TX vs Ranger, TX
The cost of living difference between Hitchcock, TX and Ranger, TX is dramatic. Ranger is 43% cheaper than Hitchcock, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Hitchcock has a cost index of 90 while Ranger sits at 63, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.
On the housing front, median rent in Hitchcock is $1,370/month compared to $836/month in Ranger — a 64% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Ranger is more affordable at $49,700 median vs $159,500.
Median household income in Hitchcock is $77,713 compared to $34,006 in Ranger (+128.5%). While Hitchcock is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Hitchcock spend roughly 21.2% of their income on rent, less than the 29.5% in Ranger.
Climate-wise, Hitchcock is notably warmer with an average of 72.3°F compared to 65°F in Ranger. Hitchcock receives more rainfall at 47.2" per year compared to 34.1" in Ranger.
Income & Cost
Housing
Salary Equivalency Calculator
What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?
Everyday Prices
BLS Average Prices by metro area
Climate
NOAA 30-year normals (1991-2020)