Highlands, CA vs Lake Hughes, CA
The cost of living difference between Highlands, CA and Lake Hughes, CA is dramatic. Lake Hughes is 115.7% cheaper than Highlands, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Highlands has a cost index of 311 while Lake Hughes sits at 144, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.
On the housing front, median rent in Highlands is $3,501/month compared to $2,031/month in Lake Hughes — a 72% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Lake Hughes is more affordable at $519,400 median vs $2,000,001.
Median household income in Highlands is $250,001 compared to $110,438 in Lake Hughes (+126.4%). While Highlands is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Highlands spend roughly 16.8% of their income on rent, less than the 22.1% in Lake Hughes.
Climate-wise, Lake Hughes is notably warmer with an average of 62.1°F compared to 58.7°F in Highlands. Highlands receives more rainfall at 19.6" per year compared to 6.8" in Lake Hughes.
Income & Cost
Housing
Salary Equivalency Calculator
What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?
Everyday Prices
BLS Average Prices by metro area
Climate
NOAA 30-year normals (1991-2020)