Hickam Housing, HI vs Kalaeloa, HI

Kalaeloa is moderately more affordable than Hickam Housing, with a 8.4% lower cost of living index. Hickam Housing scores 170 compared to 157 for Kalaeloa, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Hickam Housing can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

Renters will find that Hickam Housing has a median rent of $3,501/month while Kalaeloa comes in at $3,068/month, a 14% difference.

Median household income in Hickam Housing is $111,667 compared to $81,833 in Kalaeloa (+36.5%). While Hickam Housing is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Hickam Housing spend roughly 37.6% of their income on rent, less than the 45% in Kalaeloa. The Hickam Housing ratio exceeds the commonly recommended 30% threshold, which can put pressure on household budgets.