Hamilton, MT vs King Arthur Park, MT

The cost of living difference between Hamilton, MT and King Arthur Park, MT is dramatic. Hamilton is 33% cheaper than King Arthur Park, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Hamilton has a cost index of 86 while King Arthur Park sits at 129, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Hamilton is $958/month compared to $2,201/month in King Arthur Park — a 57% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Hamilton is more affordable at $299,800 median vs $333,500.

Median household income in Hamilton is $52,917 compared to $107,341 in King Arthur Park (-50.7%). While King Arthur Park is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Hamilton spend roughly 21.7% of their income on rent, less than the 24.6% in King Arthur Park.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (45.2°F vs 43°F). Hamilton receives more rainfall at 14.1" per year compared to 13.4" in King Arthur Park.