Grayslake, IL vs Orland Park, IL

Grayslake, IL and Orland Park, IL have a very similar cost of living, with only a 3.7% difference in their overall index. Grayslake scores 103 while Orland Park scores 107 on the cost of living index, where 100 represents the national average. The day-to-day expenses for residents in both cities are comparable, though differences emerge when looking at specific categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Grayslake is $1,434/month compared to $1,415/month in Orland Park — a 1% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Orland Park has cheaper rent, Grayslake actually has lower median home values ($293,900 vs $349,400).

Median household income in Grayslake is $113,697 compared to $98,979 in Orland Park (+14.9%). Grayslake offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Grayslake spend roughly 15.1% of their income on rent, less than the 17.2% in Orland Park.

Climate-wise, Orland Park is notably warmer with an average of 52.1°F compared to 48.3°F in Grayslake. Grayslake receives more rainfall at 35.3" per year compared to 34.4" in Orland Park.