Gloster, MS vs Lucedale, MS
There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Gloster is 22.9% cheaper than Lucedale. With a cost index of 55 vs 71, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Gloster to Lucedale should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.
On the housing front, median rent in Gloster is $576/month compared to $919/month in Lucedale — a 37% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Gloster is more affordable at $73,400 median vs $151,200.
Median household income in Gloster is $22,500 compared to $38,468 in Lucedale (-41.5%). While Lucedale is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Gloster spend roughly 30.7% of their income on rent, more than the 28.7% in Lucedale. The Lucedale ratio exceeds the commonly recommended 30% threshold, which can put pressure on household budgets.
Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (66.2°F vs 67.6°F). Lucedale receives more rainfall at 67.1" per year compared to 60.6" in Gloster.
Income & Cost
Housing
Salary Equivalency Calculator
What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?
Everyday Prices
BLS Average Prices by metro area
Climate
NOAA 30-year normals (1991-2020)