Glasgow, WV vs Spencer, WV

Spencer is moderately more affordable than Glasgow, with a 8.6% lower cost of living index. Glasgow scores 66 compared to 61 for Spencer, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Glasgow can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Glasgow is $879/month compared to $658/month in Spencer — a 34% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Spencer has cheaper rent, Glasgow actually has lower median home values ($96,900 vs $108,700).

Median household income in Glasgow is $51,304 compared to $25,897 in Spencer (+98.1%). While Glasgow is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Glasgow spend roughly 20.6% of their income on rent, less than the 30.5% in Spencer. The Glasgow ratio exceeds the commonly recommended 30% threshold, which can put pressure on household budgets.