Glasgow, MT vs Laurel, MT

Glasgow is moderately more affordable than Laurel, with a 7.6% lower cost of living index. Glasgow scores 74 compared to 80 for Laurel, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Laurel can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Glasgow is $794/month compared to $953/month in Laurel — a 17% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Glasgow is more affordable at $206,000 median vs $232,700.

Median household income in Glasgow is $76,985 compared to $66,382 in Laurel (+16%). Glasgow offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Glasgow spend roughly 12.4% of their income on rent, less than the 17.2% in Laurel.

Climate-wise, Laurel is notably warmer with an average of 48.2°F compared to 43.9°F in Glasgow. Laurel receives more rainfall at 14.3" per year compared to 13.4" in Glasgow.