Gilman, IL vs Stone Park, IL

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Gilman is 29.7% cheaper than Stone Park. With a cost index of 64 vs 91, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Gilman to Stone Park should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Gilman is $702/month compared to $1,222/month in Stone Park — a 43% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Gilman is more affordable at $108,900 median vs $218,300.

Median household income in Gilman is $65,729 compared to $75,165 in Stone Park (-12.6%). Stone Park does offer higher incomes, but the salary premium barely offsets the higher cost of living, leaving residents with a tighter budget. Looking at affordability, residents of Gilman spend roughly 12.8% of their income on rent, less than the 19.5% in Stone Park.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (52.3°F vs 51.3°F). Gilman receives more rainfall at 40.4" per year compared to 37.9" in Stone Park.