Garfield, MN vs Walker, MN

Garfield is moderately more affordable than Walker, with a 11.1% lower cost of living index. Garfield scores 61 compared to 69 for Walker, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Walker can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Garfield is $477/month compared to $519/month in Walker — a 8% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Garfield is more affordable at $162,500 median vs $240,200.

Median household income in Garfield is $70,250 compared to $35,847 in Walker (+96%). Garfield offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Garfield spend roughly 8.1% of their income on rent, less than the 17.4% in Walker.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (42.5°F vs 40.4°F). Garfield receives more rainfall at 24.1" per year compared to 23.9" in Walker.