Fort McKinley, OH vs Suffield, OH

Fort McKinley is moderately more affordable than Suffield, with a 14% lower cost of living index. Fort McKinley scores 70 compared to 81 for Suffield, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Suffield can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Fort McKinley is $1,049/month compared to $1,072/month in Suffield — a 2% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Fort McKinley is more affordable at $72,600 median vs $200,500.

Median household income in Fort McKinley is $47,176 compared to $69,821 in Suffield (-32.4%). While Suffield is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Fort McKinley spend roughly 26.7% of their income on rent, more than the 18.4% in Suffield.