Fort Atkinson, WI vs Greenfield, WI

Fort Atkinson is moderately more affordable than Greenfield, with a 12% lower cost of living index. Fort Atkinson scores 77 compared to 88 for Greenfield, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Greenfield can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Fort Atkinson is $957/month compared to $1,123/month in Greenfield — a 15% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Fort Atkinson is more affordable at $198,600 median vs $247,800.

Median household income in Fort Atkinson is $75,350 compared to $69,016 in Greenfield (+9.2%). Fort Atkinson offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Fort Atkinson spend roughly 15.2% of their income on rent, less than the 19.5% in Greenfield.