Footville, WI vs Mineral Point, WI

Footville is moderately more affordable than Mineral Point, with a 10.8% lower cost of living index. Footville scores 66 compared to 74 for Mineral Point, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Mineral Point can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Footville is $723/month compared to $767/month in Mineral Point — a 6% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Footville is more affordable at $150,400 median vs $213,000.

Median household income in Footville is $57,063 compared to $78,958 in Mineral Point (-27.7%). While Mineral Point is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Footville spend roughly 15.2% of their income on rent, more than the 11.7% in Mineral Point.