Eureka, UT vs Fillmore, UT

Fillmore is moderately more affordable than Eureka, with a 7% lower cost of living index. Eureka scores 86 compared to 80 for Fillmore, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Eureka can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Eureka is $1,036/month compared to $789/month in Fillmore — a 31% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Fillmore has cheaper rent, Eureka actually has lower median home values ($252,800 vs $275,400).

Median household income in Eureka is $70,938 compared to $77,000 in Fillmore (-7.9%). Fillmore offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Eureka spend roughly 17.5% of their income on rent, more than the 12.3% in Fillmore.