Eureka, MT vs Lolo, MT

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Eureka is 19.4% cheaper than Lolo. With a cost index of 77 vs 96, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Eureka to Lolo should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Eureka is $1,012/month compared to $1,126/month in Lolo — a 10% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Eureka is more affordable at $172,300 median vs $353,700.

Median household income in Eureka is $43,750 compared to $73,700 in Lolo (-40.6%). While Lolo is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Eureka spend roughly 27.8% of their income on rent, more than the 18.3% in Lolo.

Climate-wise, Lolo is notably warmer with an average of 45.2°F compared to 39.5°F in Eureka. Eureka receives more rainfall at 26.1" per year compared to 14.1" in Lolo.