Ephrata, WA vs Port Ludlow, WA

The cost of living difference between Ephrata, WA and Port Ludlow, WA is dramatic. Ephrata is 40.6% cheaper than Port Ludlow, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Ephrata has a cost index of 85 while Port Ludlow sits at 144, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Ephrata is $993/month compared to $1,909/month in Port Ludlow — a 48% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Ephrata is more affordable at $240,000 median vs $590,500.

Median household income in Ephrata is $70,321 compared to $92,245 in Port Ludlow (-23.8%). The higher salaries in Port Ludlow partially offset the cost difference, but don't fully close the gap. Looking at affordability, residents of Ephrata spend roughly 16.9% of their income on rent, less than the 24.8% in Port Ludlow.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (51.5°F vs 51.4°F). Port Ludlow receives more rainfall at 33.4" per year compared to 7.6" in Ephrata.