Ekalaka, MT vs Philipsburg, MT

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Ekalaka is 25.1% cheaper than Philipsburg. With a cost index of 63 vs 84, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Ekalaka to Philipsburg should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Ekalaka is $678/month compared to $871/month in Philipsburg — a 22% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Ekalaka is more affordable at $118,300 median vs $304,200.

Median household income in Ekalaka is $45,417 compared to $40,096 in Philipsburg (+13.3%). Ekalaka offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Ekalaka spend roughly 17.9% of their income on rent, less than the 26.1% in Philipsburg.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (43.5°F vs 43°F). Ekalaka receives more rainfall at 14.6" per year compared to 12.1" in Philipsburg.