Eckley, CO vs Gilcrest, CO

The cost of living difference between Eckley, CO and Gilcrest, CO is dramatic. Eckley is 41.6% cheaper than Gilcrest, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Eckley has a cost index of 67 while Gilcrest sits at 115, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Eckley is $742/month compared to $1,900/month in Gilcrest — a 61% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Eckley is more affordable at $111,300 median vs $287,000.

Median household income in Eckley is $53,125 compared to $66,771 in Gilcrest (-20.4%). Gilcrest does offer higher incomes, but the salary premium barely offsets the higher cost of living, leaving residents with a tighter budget. Looking at affordability, residents of Eckley spend roughly 16.8% of their income on rent, less than the 34.1% in Gilcrest. The Eckley ratio exceeds the commonly recommended 30% threshold, which can put pressure on household budgets.