Earlsboro, OK vs Wilson, OK

Wilson is moderately more affordable than Earlsboro, with a 10.7% lower cost of living index. Earlsboro scores 72 compared to 65 for Wilson, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Earlsboro can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Earlsboro is $883/month compared to $832/month in Wilson — a 6% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Wilson is more affordable at $102,300 median vs $168,400.

Median household income in Earlsboro is $66,827 compared to $65,375 in Wilson (+2.2%). Earlsboro does offer higher incomes, but the salary premium barely offsets the higher cost of living, leaving residents with a tighter budget. Looking at affordability, residents of Earlsboro spend roughly 15.9% of their income on rent, more than the 15.3% in Wilson.