Earlsboro, OK vs Union City, OK

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Earlsboro is 17.6% cheaper than Union City. With a cost index of 72 vs 87, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Earlsboro to Union City should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Earlsboro is $883/month compared to $1,096/month in Union City — a 19% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Earlsboro is more affordable at $168,400 median vs $268,900.

Median household income in Earlsboro is $66,827 compared to $100,000 in Union City (-33.2%). While Union City is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Earlsboro spend roughly 15.9% of their income on rent, more than the 13.2% in Union City.