Earlsboro, OK vs McCord, OK

McCord is moderately more affordable than Earlsboro, with a 10.6% lower cost of living index. Earlsboro scores 72 compared to 65 for McCord, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Earlsboro can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Earlsboro is $883/month compared to $612/month in McCord — a 44% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while McCord has cheaper rent, Earlsboro actually has lower median home values ($168,400 vs $182,700).

Median household income in Earlsboro is $66,827 compared to $73,889 in McCord (-9.6%). McCord offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Earlsboro spend roughly 15.9% of their income on rent, more than the 9.9% in McCord.