Earle, AR vs Sulphur Springs, AR

Earle is moderately more affordable than Sulphur Springs, with a 14.5% lower cost of living index. Earle scores 58 compared to 68 for Sulphur Springs, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Sulphur Springs can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Earle is $591/month compared to $874/month in Sulphur Springs — a 32% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Earle is more affordable at $93,300 median vs $110,700.

Median household income in Earle is $26,985 compared to $34,500 in Sulphur Springs (-21.8%). While Sulphur Springs is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Earle spend roughly 26.3% of their income on rent, less than the 30.4% in Sulphur Springs. The Earle ratio exceeds the commonly recommended 30% threshold, which can put pressure on household budgets.