Dakota Dunes, SD vs Redfield, SD

The cost of living difference between Dakota Dunes, SD and Redfield, SD is dramatic. Redfield is 76.3% cheaper than Dakota Dunes, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Dakota Dunes has a cost index of 108 while Redfield sits at 61, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Dakota Dunes is $1,211/month compared to $668/month in Redfield — a 81% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Redfield is more affordable at $117,000 median vs $495,000.

Median household income in Dakota Dunes is $123,438 compared to $60,586 in Redfield (+103.7%). While Dakota Dunes is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Dakota Dunes spend roughly 11.8% of their income on rent, less than the 13.2% in Redfield.