Curtiss, WI vs Franks Field, WI

Curtiss, WI and Franks Field, WI have a very similar cost of living, with only a 4.2% difference in their overall index. Curtiss scores 63 while Franks Field scores 61 on the cost of living index, where 100 represents the national average. The day-to-day expenses for residents in both cities are comparable, though differences emerge when looking at specific categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Curtiss is $792/month compared to $875/month in Franks Field — a 10% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Curtiss has cheaper rent, Franks Field actually has lower median home values ($15,800 vs $77,300).

Median household income in Curtiss is $63,958 compared to $26,429 in Franks Field (+142%). While Curtiss is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Curtiss spend roughly 14.9% of their income on rent, less than the 39.7% in Franks Field. The Curtiss ratio exceeds the commonly recommended 30% threshold, which can put pressure on household budgets.