Home / Compare / Crenshaw vs Rolling Fork

Crenshaw, MS vs Rolling Fork, MS

63
Crenshaw
Mississippi
VS
+6.4%
59
Rolling Fork
Mississippi

Rolling Fork is moderately more affordable than Crenshaw, with a 6.4% lower cost of living index. Crenshaw scores 63 compared to 59 for Rolling Fork, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Crenshaw can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Crenshaw is $824/month compared to $592/month in Rolling Fork — a 39% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Rolling Fork has cheaper rent, Crenshaw actually has lower median home values ($81,900 vs $121,100).

Median household income in Crenshaw is $36,542 compared to $34,375 in Rolling Fork (+6.3%). The higher salaries in Crenshaw partially offset the cost difference, but don't fully close the gap. Looking at affordability, residents of Crenshaw spend roughly 27.1% of their income on rent, more than the 20.7% in Rolling Fork.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (63.4°F vs 66.1°F). Crenshaw receives more rainfall at 54.9" per year compared to 53.4" in Rolling Fork.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Crenshaw
63
Rolling Fork
59
6% cheaper
Median Household Income
Crenshaw
$36,542
6% higher
Rolling Fork
$34,375

Housing

Median Rent
Crenshaw
$824
Rolling Fork
$592
28% cheaper
Median Home Value
Crenshaw
$81,900
32% cheaper
Rolling Fork
$121,100
Population
Crenshaw
675
Rolling Fork
2,001

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula:

Climate

NOAA 30-year normals (1991-2020)

Avg Temp
Crenshaw 63.4°F
Rolling Fork 66.1°F
Summer High
Crenshaw 92°F
Rolling Fork 93°F
Winter Low
Crenshaw 33°F
Rolling Fork 38°F
Rainfall
Crenshaw 54.9"
Rolling Fork 53.4"
Rainy Days
Crenshaw 111d
Rolling Fork 109d