Connell, WA vs Davenport, WA

Davenport is moderately more affordable than Connell, with a 6.6% lower cost of living index. Connell scores 89 compared to 84 for Davenport, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Connell can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Connell is $1,138/month compared to $783/month in Davenport — a 45% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Davenport has cheaper rent, Connell actually has lower median home values ($247,300 vs $302,500).

Median household income in Connell is $63,810 compared to $74,764 in Davenport (-14.7%). Davenport offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Connell spend roughly 21.4% of their income on rent, more than the 12.6% in Davenport.

Climate-wise, Connell is notably warmer with an average of 53.3°F compared to 48.6°F in Davenport. Davenport receives more rainfall at 16.5" per year compared to 7.6" in Connell.