Combined Locks, WI vs Oakfield, WI

Oakfield is moderately more affordable than Combined Locks, with a 7.3% lower cost of living index. Combined Locks scores 85 compared to 79 for Oakfield, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Combined Locks can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Combined Locks is $1,081/month compared to $916/month in Oakfield — a 18% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Oakfield is more affordable at $229,700 median vs $235,800.

Median household income in Combined Locks is $89,310 compared to $100,417 in Oakfield (-11.1%). Oakfield offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Combined Locks spend roughly 14.5% of their income on rent, more than the 10.9% in Oakfield.