Home / Compare / Columbia Falls vs Ronan

Columbia Falls, MT vs Ronan, MT

91
Columbia Falls
Montana
VS
+24.7%
73
Ronan
Montana

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Ronan is 24.7% cheaper than Columbia Falls. With a cost index of 73 vs 91, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Ronan to Columbia Falls should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Columbia Falls is $1,003/month compared to $798/month in Ronan — a 26% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Ronan is more affordable at $201,700 median vs $346,700.

Median household income in Columbia Falls is $65,313 compared to $41,429 in Ronan (+57.7%). While Columbia Falls is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Columbia Falls spend roughly 18.4% of their income on rent, less than the 23.1% in Ronan.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Columbia Falls
91
Ronan
73
20% cheaper
Median Household Income
Columbia Falls
$65,313
37% higher
Ronan
$41,429

Housing

Median Rent
Columbia Falls
$1,003
Ronan
$798
20% cheaper
Median Home Value
Columbia Falls
$346,700
Ronan
$201,700
42% cheaper
Population
Columbia Falls
5,531
Ronan
1,962

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula: