Home / Compare / Columbia Falls vs Miles City

Columbia Falls, MT vs Miles City, MT

91
Columbia Falls
Montana
VS
+20.6%
76
Miles City
Montana

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Miles City is 20.6% cheaper than Columbia Falls. With a cost index of 76 vs 91, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Miles City to Columbia Falls should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Columbia Falls is $1,003/month compared to $932/month in Miles City — a 8% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Miles City is more affordable at $182,700 median vs $346,700.

Median household income in Columbia Falls is $65,313 compared to $60,732 in Miles City (+7.5%). Columbia Falls does offer higher incomes, but the salary premium barely offsets the higher cost of living, leaving residents with a tighter budget. Looking at affordability, residents of Columbia Falls spend roughly 18.4% of their income on rent, less than the 18.4% in Miles City.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Columbia Falls
91
Miles City
76
17% cheaper
Median Household Income
Columbia Falls
$65,313
7% higher
Miles City
$60,732

Housing

Median Rent
Columbia Falls
$1,003
Miles City
$932
7% cheaper
Median Home Value
Columbia Falls
$346,700
Miles City
$182,700
47% cheaper
Population
Columbia Falls
5,531
Miles City
8,412

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula: