Home / Compare / Columbia Falls vs Malta

Columbia Falls, MT vs Malta, MT

91
Columbia Falls
Montana
VS
+40.6%
65
Malta
Montana

The cost of living difference between Columbia Falls, MT and Malta, MT is dramatic. Malta is 40.6% cheaper than Columbia Falls, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Columbia Falls has a cost index of 91 while Malta sits at 65, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Columbia Falls is $1,003/month compared to $693/month in Malta — a 45% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Malta is more affordable at $139,000 median vs $346,700.

Median household income in Columbia Falls is $65,313 compared to $59,449 in Malta (+9.9%). Columbia Falls does offer higher incomes, but the salary premium barely offsets the higher cost of living, leaving residents with a tighter budget. Looking at affordability, residents of Columbia Falls spend roughly 18.4% of their income on rent, more than the 14% in Malta.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Columbia Falls
91
Malta
65
29% cheaper
Median Household Income
Columbia Falls
$65,313
9% higher
Malta
$59,449

Housing

Median Rent
Columbia Falls
$1,003
Malta
$693
31% cheaper
Median Home Value
Columbia Falls
$346,700
Malta
$139,000
60% cheaper
Population
Columbia Falls
5,531
Malta
1,902

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula: