Clyde Hill, WA vs Ephrata, WA

The cost of living difference between Clyde Hill, WA and Ephrata, WA is dramatic. Ephrata is 262.3% cheaper than Clyde Hill, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Clyde Hill has a cost index of 310 while Ephrata sits at 85, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Clyde Hill is $3,501/month compared to $993/month in Ephrata — a 253% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Ephrata is more affordable at $240,000 median vs $2,000,001.

Median household income in Clyde Hill is $250,001 compared to $70,321 in Ephrata (+255.5%). The higher salaries in Clyde Hill partially offset the cost difference, but don't fully close the gap. Looking at affordability, residents of Clyde Hill spend roughly 16.8% of their income on rent, less than the 16.9% in Ephrata.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (53.2°F vs 51.5°F). Clyde Hill receives more rainfall at 37.8" per year compared to 7.6" in Ephrata.