Clyde Hill, WA vs Easton, WA

The cost of living difference between Clyde Hill, WA and Easton, WA is dramatic. Easton is 92.7% cheaper than Clyde Hill, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Clyde Hill has a cost index of 310 while Easton sits at 161, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Clyde Hill is $3,501/month compared to $1,917/month in Easton — a 83% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Easton is more affordable at $793,800 median vs $2,000,001.

Median household income in Clyde Hill is $250,001 compared to $115,836 in Easton (+115.8%). While Clyde Hill is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Clyde Hill spend roughly 16.8% of their income on rent, less than the 19.9% in Easton.

Climate-wise, Clyde Hill is notably warmer with an average of 53.2°F compared to 42.4°F in Easton. Easton receives more rainfall at 85" per year compared to 37.8" in Clyde Hill.