Clinton, WI vs Rockland, WI

Clinton is moderately more affordable than Rockland, with a 5.9% lower cost of living index. Clinton scores 79 compared to 84 for Rockland, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Rockland can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $1,071/month compared to $1,133/month in Rockland — a 6% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Clinton is more affordable at $172,300 median vs $213,600.

Median household income in Clinton is $68,571 compared to $75,625 in Rockland (-9.3%). While Rockland is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 18.7% of their income on rent, more than the 18% in Rockland.