Clinton, UT vs Woods Cross, UT

Clinton, UT and Woods Cross, UT have a very similar cost of living, with only a 0.6% difference in their overall index. Clinton scores 121 while Woods Cross scores 120 on the cost of living index, where 100 represents the national average. The day-to-day expenses for residents in both cities are comparable, though differences emerge when looking at specific categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $1,760/month compared to $1,572/month in Woods Cross — a 12% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Woods Cross has cheaper rent, Clinton actually has lower median home values ($412,200 vs $472,600).

Median household income in Clinton is $109,915 compared to $115,335 in Woods Cross (-4.7%). Woods Cross offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 19.2% of their income on rent, more than the 16.4% in Woods Cross.