Clinton, UT vs Richfield, UT

The cost of living difference between Clinton, UT and Richfield, UT is dramatic. Richfield is 45.7% cheaper than Clinton, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Clinton has a cost index of 121 while Richfield sits at 83, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $1,760/month compared to $850/month in Richfield — a 107% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Richfield is more affordable at $287,500 median vs $412,200.

Median household income in Clinton is $109,915 compared to $77,847 in Richfield (+41.2%). The higher salaries in Clinton partially offset the cost difference, but don't fully close the gap. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 19.2% of their income on rent, more than the 13.1% in Richfield.