Clinton, UT vs Lindon, UT

Clinton is moderately more affordable than Lindon, with a 8.1% lower cost of living index. Clinton scores 121 compared to 131 for Lindon, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Lindon can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $1,760/month compared to $1,502/month in Lindon — a 17% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Lindon has cheaper rent, Clinton actually has lower median home values ($412,200 vs $638,300).

Median household income in Clinton is $109,915 compared to $104,583 in Lindon (+5.1%). Clinton offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 19.2% of their income on rent, more than the 17.2% in Lindon.