Clinton, UT vs Eagle Mountain, UT

Clinton is moderately more affordable than Eagle Mountain, with a 8.8% lower cost of living index. Clinton scores 121 compared to 133 for Eagle Mountain, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Eagle Mountain can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $1,760/month compared to $1,995/month in Eagle Mountain — a 12% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Clinton is more affordable at $412,200 median vs $469,500.

Median household income in Clinton is $109,915 compared to $105,576 in Eagle Mountain (+4.1%). Clinton offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 19.2% of their income on rent, less than the 22.7% in Eagle Mountain.