Clinton, OK vs Mustang, OK

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Clinton is 23.7% cheaper than Mustang. With a cost index of 67 vs 88, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Clinton to Mustang should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $888/month compared to $1,243/month in Mustang — a 29% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Clinton is more affordable at $112,500 median vs $227,800.

Median household income in Clinton is $58,417 compared to $88,262 in Mustang (-33.8%). While Mustang is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 18.2% of their income on rent, more than the 16.9% in Mustang.