Clinton, OH vs Waldo, OH

Clinton is moderately more affordable than Waldo, with a 7.2% lower cost of living index. Clinton scores 69 compared to 74 for Waldo, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Waldo can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $735/month compared to $950/month in Waldo — a 23% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Clinton has cheaper rent, Waldo actually has lower median home values ($149,100 vs $171,200).

Median household income in Clinton is $78,750 compared to $72,083 in Waldo (+9.2%). Clinton offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 11.2% of their income on rent, less than the 15.8% in Waldo.