Clinton, OH vs Loudonville, OH

Loudonville is moderately more affordable than Clinton, with a 5.5% lower cost of living index. Clinton scores 69 compared to 65 for Loudonville, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Clinton can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $735/month compared to $683/month in Loudonville — a 8% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Loudonville is more affordable at $151,400 median vs $171,200.

Median household income in Clinton is $78,750 compared to $54,508 in Loudonville (+44.5%). While Clinton is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 11.2% of their income on rent, less than the 15% in Loudonville.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (51.7°F vs 50.2°F). Clinton receives more rainfall at 41.6" per year compared to 41.3" in Loudonville.