Clinton, OH vs Lordstown, OH

Clinton is moderately more affordable than Lordstown, with a 5.3% lower cost of living index. Clinton scores 69 compared to 73 for Lordstown, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Lordstown can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $735/month compared to $968/month in Lordstown — a 24% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Clinton has cheaper rent, Lordstown actually has lower median home values ($161,900 vs $171,200).

Median household income in Clinton is $78,750 compared to $64,503 in Lordstown (+22.1%). Clinton offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 11.2% of their income on rent, less than the 18% in Lordstown.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (51.7°F vs 49.9°F). Clinton receives more rainfall at 41.6" per year compared to 41.2" in Lordstown.