Clinton, MT vs Roberts, MT

Roberts is moderately more affordable than Clinton, with a 8.5% lower cost of living index. Clinton scores 93 compared to 86 for Roberts, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Clinton can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $1,109/month compared to $1,182/month in Roberts — a 6% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Clinton has cheaper rent, Roberts actually has lower median home values ($225,000 vs $326,100).

Median household income in Clinton is $89,482 compared to $92,589 in Roberts (-3.4%). Roberts offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 14.9% of their income on rent, less than the 15.3% in Roberts.