Clinton, MT vs Red Lodge, MT

Red Lodge is moderately more affordable than Clinton, with a 7.5% lower cost of living index. Clinton scores 93 compared to 87 for Red Lodge, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Clinton can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $1,109/month compared to $805/month in Red Lodge — a 38% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Red Lodge has cheaper rent, Clinton actually has lower median home values ($326,100 vs $374,900).

Median household income in Clinton is $89,482 compared to $43,857 in Red Lodge (+104%). While Clinton is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 14.9% of their income on rent, less than the 22% in Red Lodge.