Clinton, MT vs Nashua, MT

The cost of living difference between Clinton, MT and Nashua, MT is dramatic. Nashua is 44.4% cheaper than Clinton, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Clinton has a cost index of 93 while Nashua sits at 65, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $1,109/month compared to $675/month in Nashua — a 64% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Nashua is more affordable at $140,300 median vs $326,100.

Median household income in Clinton is $89,482 compared to $72,500 in Nashua (+23.4%). The higher salaries in Clinton partially offset the cost difference, but don't fully close the gap. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 14.9% of their income on rent, more than the 11.2% in Nashua.