Clinton, MT vs Crow Agency, MT

The cost of living difference between Clinton, MT and Crow Agency, MT is dramatic. Crow Agency is 72.3% cheaper than Clinton, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Clinton has a cost index of 93 while Crow Agency sits at 54, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $1,109/month compared to $470/month in Crow Agency — a 136% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Crow Agency is more affordable at $88,500 median vs $326,100.

Median household income in Clinton is $89,482 compared to $49,333 in Crow Agency (+81.4%). While Clinton is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 14.9% of their income on rent, more than the 11.4% in Crow Agency.