Clinton, MO vs Sugar Creek, MO

Clinton is moderately more affordable than Sugar Creek, with a 5.9% lower cost of living index. Clinton scores 66 compared to 70 for Sugar Creek, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Sugar Creek can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $706/month compared to $936/month in Sugar Creek — a 25% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Clinton has cheaper rent, Sugar Creek actually has lower median home values ($104,800 vs $147,700).

Median household income in Clinton is $50,852 compared to $57,467 in Sugar Creek (-11.5%). While Sugar Creek is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 16.7% of their income on rent, less than the 19.5% in Sugar Creek.