Clinton, MO vs St. Paul, MO

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Clinton is 26.4% cheaper than St. Paul. With a cost index of 66 vs 89, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Clinton to St. Paul should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $706/month compared to $697/month in St. Paul — a 1% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while St. Paul has cheaper rent, Clinton actually has lower median home values ($147,700 vs $421,900).

Median household income in Clinton is $50,852 compared to $154,022 in St. Paul (-67%). While St. Paul is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 16.7% of their income on rent, more than the 5.4% in St. Paul.